A Smart Dude Reads Moby-Dick: Episode 1

Editor’s note: When Avidly learned that smart dude (and Avidly contributor) Jake Bartolone was reading Moby-Dick for the first time, we jumped at the chance to get an annotated account of the “first encounter with Moby-Dick” experience. We are approaching this scientifically! We are hoping that Jake will provide regular updates on his Melvillian encounter and that they will be useful to us as we prepare to teach Moby-Dick in our various classes. Also, it is an excuse to quote Moby-Dick at each other, so, score. Jake! Already you are boldly launched upon the deep; but soon you shall be lost in its unshored, harborless immensities. Wait, I am not sure you have read that far. 

 


I have never read Moby Dick.

I am, however, a voracious reader, primarily but not exclusively of science fiction and fantasy. I dig writing that tackles hard questions but doesn’t take itself too seriously (though I sometimes like stuff that takes itself way too seriously), beautiful prose, and anything post-apocalyptic. And I recently read Railsea, which is China Mieville (for my money, one of the best living writing) riffing on Moby Dick (or, I guess, on the more perplexingly punctuated Moby-Dick; or, the Whale). I thought: China Mieville likes it, so does Tilda Swinton, and even @NotTildaSwinton. Might as well try.

Here’s about all I knew about this Moby Dick/Moby-Dick book: there’s some dude named Ahab who’s all about the titular giant white whale, the narrator is named Ishmael (or at least wants us to call him that), and a whole lot of people have tried to read the book and given up. Oh, and the band Mastodon has a ton of really bombastic metal songs about it (when they’re not singing about the Elephant Man or laser-eyed Cyclops and shit), and people seem to like to drop references to it all the time.

I didn’t have high hopes, but I figured that slogging through the book would be worth the payoff in literary references and street cred. So now it’s the first book I’m reading on Kindle for iPhone (it’s free!), which I assume is pretty much what Melville had in mind.

I expected a dry, meandering extended metaphor with lots of old-timey words and phrases. Instead, it’s more like reading a hipster’s lifestyle blog, but a hilarious and awesome one. Ishmael is basically like, ‘sup losers, I’m way too restless to have a job so I just try cool shit every couple years and don’t care about being dirt poor because I’m all about the experiences, man. So now I’m going to go be a whaler because I heard some band (likely the mid-1800s version of The Decemberists) sing about it and it sounded so authentic, you know? And this is my blog where I’m going to tell you about all the cool shit that happens along the way in excruciating detail.

I’m 73 pages in (out of 549), according to the Kindle app. It is not hard, for me, to imagine Ishmael curating a book of artificially distressed woodcuts to be the Instagram-laden tumblr-equivalent companion piece to his whaler lifestyle blog.

I imagine Ishmael’s artfully-distressed woodcuts/instagram feed.

So far this is what’s happened. Ishmael has wandered from inn to inn and ended up getting stuck rooming with Queequeg, a totally scary idol-worshipping cannibal, but you guys, he’s just misunderstood! He’s actually totally chill! Now Ishmael is finding them a whaler to go out on since they’re besties (befriending an actual cannibal is worth a shitload of hipster points) and maybe even a little hipster-gay for each other?

I still have so many questions. First, what’s up with the fusty title? Why is there a hyphen in Moby-Dick (although not in the public domain version I have)? Why do I love titles that go THING: or, OTHER THING so much? Then, what with all of the foreshadowing (subtle and un-; LOOMINGS), and my vague understanding that there is much bloodshed and tragedy ahead (I mean, just go listen to Mastodon’s Blood and Thunder), I assume that shit is going to get real at some point. But how real? And how soon? And will Ishmael describe it all in the same chillaxed, let me mansplain you some cool historical context, fashion when it does? Regardless, I am following the shit out of this guy’s twitter feed (haha, like Ishmael could say anything in 140 characters).

 

Jake Bartolone: Exactly that type of person.

 



  1. September 20, 2012 @ 11:45 am Sarah Mesle on Facebook

    Jake Bartolone, Research Scientist and Lola-playing bassist, returns to Avidly! DUDES. I AM PUMPED.

    Reply

  2. September 20, 2012 @ 11:47 am Sarah Mesle on Facebook

    Scholars of Moby-Dick! Come answer Jake’s new-to-melville questions, like, “Why do I love titles that go THING: or, OTHER THING so much? ” You guys, THAT IS A GOOD GOOD QUESTION.

    Reply

  3. September 20, 2012 @ 11:51 am Barbara Mesle on Facebook

    Ognen Cemerski

    Reply

  4. September 20, 2012 @ 11:53 am Jordan Stein on Facebook

    Amy Parsons!!

    Reply

  5. September 20, 2012 @ 11:54 am Sarah Mesle on Facebook

    My only problem with this is that when Jake adds “melville scholar” to his already long list of accomplishments, I am really going to shit myself.

    Reply

  6. September 20, 2012 @ 12:33 pm Jake Bartolone on Facebook

    If “melville scholar” means someone who listens to prog-metal and alternates between dick jokes and punctuation humor while describing this book, then stock up on Depends.

    Reply

  7. September 20, 2012 @ 12:33 pm Jake Bartolone on Facebook

    I feel like I need a much more hipstery profile pic — hang on.

    Reply

  8. September 20, 2012 @ 12:42 pm Hester Blum on Facebook

    The entire book is a dick joke–Dick meant the same thing in 1851 as now–so you are totally already there.

    Reply

  9. September 20, 2012 @ 12:47 pm Jake Bartolone on Facebook

    I feel like this book needs better marketing, and maybe a James Franco-helmed film project. (Can someone please pitch this to Channing Tatum?)

    Reply

  10. September 20, 2012 @ 12:48 pm Sarah Mesle on Facebook

    If I have the chance, I will totally pitch it to Channing Tatum.

    Reply

  11. September 20, 2012 @ 1:02 pm Sarah Mesle on Facebook

    I want to go on record here, and this is important to me: I do not think Ishmael is guilty of mansplaining. Whether he is guilty of strategic mancompetence, however, is a more complicated question (amiright, Hester.)

    Reply

  12. September 20, 2012 @ 1:07 pm Hester Blum on Facebook

    Excellent questions. Mansplaining, probs not, since he’s all about incompletion, fragmentation, not knowing shit while trying to know it. Strategic mancompetence?–he does disappear a lot, true. But given all the really cool shit about himself he *doesn’t* tell us about–like the fact that hipster Ishmael has full sleeve tattoos even as he’s all pretending to be freaked out by Queequeg’s tattoos, like what’s up with the lounging boys from Lima, etc. etc. we may need a new term. Fauxhemian distance?

    Reply

  13. September 20, 2012 @ 1:11 pm Jake Bartolone on Facebook

    Hm. I did throw “mansplaining” in there without thinking about it too hard, and maybe you’re right. He does tend to get pretty explainy in the first handful of chapters, which is what I had in mind. Perhaps it would be more accurate to say that he frequently goes off on a mangent.

    Reply

  14. September 20, 2012 @ 1:12 pm Sarah Mesle on Facebook

    !!!!

    Reply

  15. September 20, 2012 @ 1:12 pm Sarah Mesle on Facebook

    MELVILLE SCHOLARSHIP BREAKTHROUGH!!!!!

    Reply

  16. September 20, 2012 @ 1:13 pm Jake Bartolone on Facebook

    Shit is getting real up in here.

    Reply

  17. September 20, 2012 @ 1:51 pm Sarah Mesle on Facebook

    this whole mansplain/mancompetence/mangent discussion is so great, and it really makes me wish I were still teaching moby-dick ( Teny) because it would be the most awesome way to start a discussion about gender and Ishmael’s language. TAKE NOTE, Jake Bartolone, because this is actually going to be helpful as you get further in to the book.

    Reply

  18. September 20, 2012 @ 2:00 pm Jake Bartolone on Facebook

    Two linguistic thoughts/questions, actually. First, maybe aimed at Hester: we’ve established that dick meant dick back in the day. Did Moby have a meaning back then? Because I’m pretty sure that little bald DJ guy wasn’t around back then. Second, more of a comment: I thought it was pretty interesting that we don’t see Queequeg talk for the first several chapters, it’s just Ishmael describing what he said. When he finally does have dialog on the page, it’s brief but jarring.

    Reply

  19. September 20, 2012 @ 2:06 pm Hester Blum on Facebook

    No consensus on Moby–see here: http://www.melville.org/mobyname.htm. But Moby the douchey DJ is a descendent of HM, and took the name for that reason.

    Reply

  20. September 20, 2012 @ 2:08 pm Hester Blum on Facebook

    But given the melville.org folk don’t acknowledge the meaning of Dick maybe not trust that wholly.

    Reply

  21. September 20, 2012 @ 2:13 pm Jake Bartolone on Facebook

    Yeah, Mocha Dick sounds like something totally different.

    Reply

  22. September 20, 2012 @ 2:27 pm Sarah Mesle on Facebook

    Jake, the point about Queequeg not actually talking is a really good one. One good way to think through that: how is melville staging the difference between ishamel/queequeg’s ways of learning/knowing? Ishmael generates reams and reams of text; Queequeg IS text (that’s a little glib, but, you know). Though, per hester’s point, what we know about the difference between them changes throughout the text (cf IShmael’s tattoos; SHHH, Hester, Spoiler!!)

    Reply

  23. September 20, 2012 @ 2:29 pm Jake Bartolone on Facebook

    To be fair, I’ve already pictured Ishmael with a full sleeve and lens-less frames, so that wasn’t a shocker.

    Reply

  24. September 20, 2012 @ 2:29 pm Hester Blum on Facebook

    True that. Although as they get married we can think of Ishmael speaking for Q as a husband’s way of speaking for his spouse, as all good husbands do.

    Reply

  25. September 20, 2012 @ 2:30 pm Hester Blum on Facebook

    I love this conversation. I am terrible at alerting about spoilers, sorry.

    Reply

  26. September 20, 2012 @ 2:31 pm Sarah Mesle on Facebook

    I think it is an actually really revealing thing about this book, and what’s at stake in it, that “HOLY SHIT ISHMAEL HAS TATTOOOS!!” is actually a really meaningful spoiler. like, that CHANGES THE WHOLE THING. also, Peter Coviello and Sarah Blackwood, i know you’re busy, like, teaching moby-dick today to your actual students, but I am fairly desperate for you to weigh in on this conversation. If i were teaching moby-dick today, I would totally make the point about the tattoo spoiler.

    Reply

    • December 30, 2012 @ 1:38 am Moe

      Where does it reveal that Ishmael has tattoos? I missed that part (which isn’t too surprising, I think, in such a massive book).

      Also, how did you think that was revealing? It doesn’t really change anything for me.

      Reply

      • December 30, 2012 @ 9:29 am Sarah and Sarah

        Two things, quickly. First, as hinted above, Ishmael’s tattoos make the difference between Ishmael and Queequeg–his description of Queequeg’s tattoos make it seem as if he finds the tattoos barbaric, and then you learn that he’s right in there, with that barbarism. Second, they tell you something about what Ishamel does after the voyage of the Pequod. Instead of being all, “whoah, sailors be crazy,” he continued into the sailor-crazy himself.

        Reply

        • December 30, 2012 @ 8:39 pm Moe

          Ah, interesting point, although I’m not sure I agree that alters the central themes of the book all that much. After all, Ismael quickly gets over Queequeg;s appearance and acknowledges that he is human and his equal.

          Sorry if I’m being dense, but I still can’t find where it mentions that Ismael has tattoos. Were you serious about that, or only joking?

          Reply

  27. September 20, 2012 @ 3:40 pm Joseph Dimuro on Facebook

    Exactly.

    Reply

  28. September 20, 2012 @ 3:44 pm Sarah Blackwood on Facebook

    YOU GUYS.

    Reply

  29. September 20, 2012 @ 3:45 pm Sarah Blackwood on Facebook

    I just got back from taking my students on a walking tour down to the battery where I made them listen to me read from Moby-Dick and expound on landlessness and inlanders. I made them FEEL the WILD WIND down there and THINK ABOUT THEIR CHAINED DESKS back at campus and then at the end I paused and said, “Okay, we can leave it there. You can stay here ocean gazing, or you can go back to your chains and desks” and every single one of them turned on their heel in a second and left.

    Reply

  30. September 20, 2012 @ 3:46 pm Sarah Blackwood on Facebook

    Sigh.

    Reply

  31. September 20, 2012 @ 3:46 pm Sarah Blackwood on Facebook

    To be fair, I did immediately check my phone.

    Reply

  32. October 9, 2012 @ 10:54 am A Smart Dude Reads Moby-Dick: Episode 2 | Avidly

    […] Dude Jake Bartolone returns with an update on his Moby-Dickery.  Check out the first installment here, and  comment away if you have thoughts on Jake’s questions (or his non-questions). […]

    Reply

  33. October 19, 2012 @ 11:07 am A Smart Dude Reads Moby-Dick: Episode 3. ENTER CYBORG WE MEAN AHAB | Avidly

    […] we’re pleased to bring you our third installment of a Smart Dude.  (Click for episodes one and two.) We promise that we are inviting the Smart Dude back out of genuine enthusiasm and not […]

    Reply

  34. December 30, 2012 @ 1:40 am Moe

    Is there a part two, three, etc. to this? Or did Jake fail to finish Moby Dick too? 😉

    Reply

    • December 30, 2012 @ 9:24 am Sarah and Sarah

      yep, Jake is up to part 4. searchable!

      Reply

      • December 30, 2012 @ 9:39 am Jake

        I’m overdue for part 5 — I’ll try to work on that later today/tomorrow.

        Reply

      • December 30, 2012 @ 8:41 pm Moe

        How do I dooooo it? Google, or is there some way to find it through the blog interface?

        Reply

        • December 30, 2012 @ 9:16 pm Moe

          Ok, figured it out. Sorry!

          Reply


THOUGHTS?

Your email address will not be published.